That which is pseudo-physical pseudo-taking under chemistry, like pseudo-mass under volume, at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass can be saved to metaphysical Being at the northeast point thereof, whereas that which is chemical giving can only be counter-damned to pseudo-metachemical pseudo-Doing, pseud0-space under time.
Therefore Being over pseudo-Doing is the church-hegemonic axial alternative to and in some sense resolution of pseudo-taking under giving – commensurate with the salvation of the pseudo-physical to metaphysics and the counter-damnation of the chemical to pseudo-metachemistry.
In the-not-entirely implausible event of the pseudo-physical being saved to metaphysics and the chemical counter-damned to pseudo-metachemistry, the metachemical would be damned to pseudo-chemistry and the pseudo-metaphysical counter-saved to physics, neither of which would be sustainable alternatives to an axial polarity with metachemistry and pseudo-metaphysics.
Therefore, irrespective of this fact and of the proper solution to it (in relation to the church-hegemonic axis), that which is metachemical Doing at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass can be damned to pseudo-chemical pseudo-giving at the southeast point thereof, whereas that which is pseudo-metaphysical pseudo-Being can only be counter-saved to physical taking.
Therefore pseudo-giving under taking, as of pseudo-volume under mass, is the state-hegemonic axial alternative to Doing over pseudo-Being, as of space over pseudo-time – commensurate with the damnation of the metachemical to pseudo-chemistry and the counter-salvation of the pseudo-metaphysical to physics.